Here's a thought - what didn't get touched?
* Access to Super/Smsf though the under 48s will have to wait longer to qualify for the pension
* excise on vices hasn't been increased
* negative gearing
* personal rates of tax (Dazz you have been hit with a 2% levy on income over $180k, a bit hard to take)
The electorate complains that governments are all about the next election, this one looks well past the election cycle (or three) where the benefits will be felt. Yet we have the hide to complain anyway.
We live in a society that wants for little, yet expects everything but without the pain of saving.
How can political parties say that the budget is wrong if the sword has two sides - savings/cuts & directed revenue raising?
This is not a big spending budget as there is no cornucopia from the mining tax or carbon tax reform.
* Access to Super/Smsf though the under 48s will have to wait longer to qualify for the pension
* excise on vices hasn't been increased
* negative gearing
* personal rates of tax (Dazz you have been hit with a 2% levy on income over $180k, a bit hard to take)
The electorate complains that governments are all about the next election, this one looks well past the election cycle (or three) where the benefits will be felt. Yet we have the hide to complain anyway.
We live in a society that wants for little, yet expects everything but without the pain of saving.
How can political parties say that the budget is wrong if the sword has two sides - savings/cuts & directed revenue raising?
This is not a big spending budget as there is no cornucopia from the mining tax or carbon tax reform.