If you need it translated, here goes: I feel more pity for a family that loses one home and their only home, than for some cashed up investor who has a home already but loses one property on the side... he will not be kicked out on the streets unlike the first family, GET IT?
Why exactly would a cashed up investor lose the property in the first place? If interest rates went up I'll just grin and bear it (and pass on some of the pain to the tenant). And if the first family was cashed up, why would they lose THEIR one and only home?
Alex