The allegation is that housing research companies like RP Data tend to project positive home value forecasts because many of those who buy their research are involved in real estate - as is RP Data's research partner, Rismark.
Thats a massive statement to make without providing further details..
My issue with this statement is that I cannot find a logical reason why RP DATA would project positive value forecasts..
RP DATA clients include, valuers, banks, developers, builders, investors etc..
Lets say for instance RP DATA projected massive falls, why would any of the above listed clients then stop buying RP DATA services in reaction???
If RP DATA had a conflict of interest e.g. it was owned by some of the countries major builders or real estate agents then that maybe a reason but its not to my knowledge..
People who use RP DATA are simply looking for data not a glowing report or negative just the truth or honest advice.
I am simply struggling to find a reason why RP DATA would even care if its data or advice was positive or negative.
People can claim HIA\MBA may provide misleading advice given their obvious bias but RP DATA? makes little sense to me..
I lose interest in the rest of the report when the material\sources are some random guys view at an auction, RP DATA's competitor and the reporters say so.
My main gripe is with this report is the the swipe against RP DATA. Lastly lets say there is even a hint RPDATA falsifies data or provides incorrect analysis would you really think banks, valuers etc would keep buying their data? Makes no sense to me.