I also have stopped using moisturiser with chemicals in it
I bet you haven't! I bet it's probably full of
dihydrogen monoxide; I couldn't believe how pervasive that stuff is, even in natural products! It's
terrifying.
C'mon, wylie, I know you're smarter than that, and you'd be scathing of anybody who had the same broad-brush reaction to "debt" or "real estate agent" as you seem to have to "chemicals". What's with all the fear of the word "chemicals"? Chemicals are substances produced by chemical reactions. Every living thing is the result of billions of chemical reactions. The chemical reaction of photosynthesis is what generates the oxygen in forests. Respiration is the sum of chemical reactions that allow us to breathe that oxygen.
Lots of people will probably say "she didn't mean that, she meant artificial chemicals". Well, since when is natural inherently better for us than artificial? Arsenic, uranium, mercury and lead are all naturally occurring, but that doesn't mean I'd put them on my face. Whereas there are plenty of artificial but well-tested and inert chemicals that I'd be happy to put on my face.
People somehow think, for example, that if they're depressed, taking St John's Wort herbal tablets is better than taking an antidepressant because it's "natural". Well, I have to heartily disagree. With St John's Wort, you're taking a weak dose of the active ingredient, and combining it with a plethora of other chemicals (yes!) that you don't need - the millions of other substances that are naturally part of the St John's Wort plant. The antidepressant is a purified form of active substance. How can it be better to take an uncontrolled soup of chemicals, than a therapeutically controlled dose of the component that you know has the effect?
Somebody's going to say "but they occur naturally, not in a test tube or vat". So what? It doesn't change what the product is. Is a child produced by IVF somehow less human than the rest of us, because their fertilisation happened outside the body? Surely we've grown past that kind of superstition.
What about cooking? Wouldn't it be more natural to eat only raw foods, than to mix them together and apply heat to cook? (Yes, I know some raw food advocates do just that. Good luck to them, but I'm going to take advantage of recent technological developments such as the discovery of fire and manufacture of tools.
)
And don't even START me on "organic"! Really, don't - you'll wish you hadn't.
Boy, my pet peeve first thing in the morning... LOL