Well Dubai - too hot
WA - too far from anywhere
Singapore - too expensive and too small (but little India is good)
USA - well it is the USA.
NAH wouldn't want any to live in any of the above.
must....not....bite....must....hold....tongue.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well Dubai - too hot
WA - too far from anywhere
Singapore - too expensive and too small (but little India is good)
USA - well it is the USA.
NAH wouldn't want any to live in any of the above.
are you for freakin' real?
sand is more stable than clay can dream of! hell - even sand on shale rock is better than clay.
here in WA about 80% of all new development is sand down to at least 2.0m - those that are on clay or mud end up being backfilled with - wait for it - SAND!
in fact - clay in the metro area is near-on unheard of except for near the river and low lying foothills basins like Armadale.
you guys over east crack me up!!
This is not far from rivers so i guess the movement is from all the elements related to owning a house in river land..
M or S class site there for sure - not A. BIG difference.
AS 2872 is for Atmospheric heating of vessels containing fluids..True BC, but only if the structural integrity of the GCI - gross compaction index - is above 4.6 as per section 27 (a) (iii) of AS 2872.
Beefed up? As Blue Card mentioned, an engineer can design with the BCA under "deemed to comply", which makes me think it's all optional.. If they're willing to sign off on ridiculously thin slabs, good luck to them..The Structerre civil engineers have a different standard again, working to BCA 43(a), which is just a beefed up version of AS 2872 for sandy areas.
If they're willing to sign off on ridiculously thin slabs, good luck to them..
they're probably going to have to beef up the mesh from what the concretors like (F72 in 100mm) to what the concretors put up with (F62 in 85mm) to what concretors will walk off site because of (F52 in 75mm?) because they can't get their feet in between the holes to work while pouring.
I can see lot's of potential here, only been up this way myself for 6 months and one thing I really noticed was how much more friendlier people are compared to Sydney.The city is slowly getting rejuvenated- lots of people are now very interested in whats happening. And how good is Stockton? Think of how much a similar house that close to the city and beach costs in Sydney.
.
Yes I felt that way when I first seen Newcastle. The tall buildings seem to give it a dark and cold feel plus with the industrial thing too. I still haven't seen much of Newcastle yet but one thing that it really needs on the center of the city is a bit of a cleanup and renovation as some of the buidlings along the main roads look very untidy. It seems Newcastle is lacking a modern planner but they could still keep the character and historic buildings. I can imagine some old bloke in his 70's with a similar board are on the local council taking 10 years to approve a basic development etc.When I met my hubbie, he was living on the Central Coast (He had migrated from UK 12 months earlier) and he said "God who'd want to live in Newcastle, its ugly" and I said to him "So you drove past the old BHP site and a couple of run down areas and thought that was Newcastle. I'll show you the real Newcastle and then lets see what you think" a few months later he moved here and doesn't want to live any where else now.