This is a cat and mouse game between greed and fear.
May even be a DEAD cat & mouse game....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is a cat and mouse game between greed and fear.
Very presumptuous saying that we had survived the banking/financial crisis given the number of failed & problem banks were still increasing in the US when you wrote this post, now things are much much worse.We appear to have survived the banking/financial crisis. So what's going to be the catalyst for the expected 2nd leg down ?
How much of this do you feel is already priced in ? The effect of Subprime resets was unknown back in 2007. The imminent Option ARM resets over the next 2 years is a 'known known'. I'd expect that event to have been priced into expectations many months ago.Very presumptuous saying that we had survived the banking/financial crisis given the number of failed & problem banks were still increasing in the US when you wrote this post, now things are much much worse.
This is definitely the eye of the storm. This is a great depiction of the eye (though no guarantee this will definitely be the catalyst as there are other things that could set off a large negative chain of events):
I agree; I think the option ARM resets is an entirely different kettle of fish and has largely already been factored in to forecasts.How much of this do you feel is already priced in ? The effect of Subprime resets was unknown back in 2007. The imminent Option ARM resets over the next 2 years is a 'known known'. I'd expect that event to have been priced into expectations many months ago.
Thanks for the links,i'm not too sure about the eye of the storm, you have to see through the media spins as most of it is useless info,just investing journalists with their opinions,but one item is starting to stand out again the engine of growth in China is starting to pick up again so anything to do with miners will do well over the next 5 years..imho willair..Very presumptuous saying that we had survived the banking/financial crisis given the number of failed & problem banks were still increasing in the US when you wrote this post, now things are much much worse.
This is definitely the eye of the storm. This is a great depiction of the eye (though no guarantee this will definitely be the catalyst as there are other things that could set off a large negative chain of events):
http://www.economicpopulist.org/files/images/arm_reset_schedule.jpg
You will note that we are right in the middle of these resets...between subprime and options arms/alt-a.
How are these loans performing (those coming up for reset)?
Moody’s Links Option ARM, Subprime Performance
Great to see we're all open to mature adult discussion hereYeah yeah worlds going to end
Priced into what keithj? I would say the general stock markets do not accurately reflect the danger that awaits, if you'd asked me at the March lows I might have agreed it was priced in, but not after a 50% rally. Has US housing priced it in? Possibly, but there is a lot of housing on the sidelines being kept off the market artificially by the US banks to avoid their assets being revalued and because more stock on the market will drive prices down further...How much of this do you feel is already priced in ? The effect of Subprime resets was unknown back in 2007. The imminent Option ARM resets over the next 2 years is a 'known known'. I'd expect that event to have been priced into expectations many months ago.
hobo-jo.. what probability do you place on Option ARM resets causing another financial crisis ? 100% guaranteed ? or somewhat less ?
Subprime more risky? With early indications of a 40% default rate how much riskier do you think subprime really was?I agree; I think the option ARM resets is an entirely different kettle of fish and has largely already been factored in to forecasts.
1) The mortgagors are a different set of people - subprime is a market inherently more risky than regular full doc variable mortgages with a honeymoon rate.
2) As keithj has highlighted, the option ARM resets have been on the radar for at least a few years; the subprime resets wasn't widely acknowledged as a potential disaster.
3) The magnitude is smaller (ie volume of option ARMs vs subprime).
This is a clip out of the article I linked above:I read recently, that the US zero cash rate policy means most of these new resets to come are actually resetting to much the same variable rate now that they were on as a teaser rate. i.e. No change. The issue with the sub-prime resets was that they were all resetting to higher rates which meant the borrowers couldn't service the loans which flooded the market with forced sales. The situation this time around is completely different. To start with, the loan quality of these Alt-A and Option ARM resets is much better and the reset rate is much more accommodating.
Don't get all carried away with the new age doom and gloom crowd. This time through won't be nearly so painful as the initial explosion of sub-prime due to its completely different loan profiles.
Can you provide a link re loans resetting to much the same as they are now?And many of these loans have yet to experience a recast event, when initial minimum monthly payments jump as much as 60%
Sure!This is a clip out of the article I linked above:
Can you provide a link re loans resetting to much the same as they are now?
Business Insider said:Some specific misunderstandings cause confusion about a possible “reset wave”:
- Differing fixed terms mean hybrid ARMs reset over a 15+ year span in a less concentrated manner than projected.
- Hybrid ARM resets currently often go down, not up.
- Many ARMs due to reset or recast have been refinanced, modified, foreclosed, or paid from sale. This includes many POAs that recast well before schedule.
- Where resets would increase the rates, lenders often just extend (or modify).
Thanks for the link, will have a closer look tonight, but have to wonder why you have the interest in Gold if everything is so rosy...Sure!
But a quick Google would have given it to you. Google "Alt A Reset Rates" and its the first link. Its not exactly "hidden, secret squirrel stuff"...
The "Coming Alt-A Mortgage Reset Bomb" Is A Myth
Don't lose too much sleep over it mate. You're suffering from D&G Hysteri-opia. Nasty little disease, but nothing a good little lie down over a book of hard facts can't cure...
Cheers,
Michael
Quant easing and a devaluing USD. The US economy is still in dire straights, regardless of pending resets. They're going to be over-stimulatory for all of 2010 and maybe a touch more. Commodity bubbles will ensue...Thanks for the link, will have a closer look tonight, but have to wonder why you have the interest in Gold if everything is so rosy...
Business Spectator said:Tony Boeckh, the founder of Bank Credit Analyst newsletter, and one of the wisest, least excitable commentators around, says, first, that “valuations are not yet in bubble territory”, and second that “although this may not be a bubble yet, we are certainly on track for one.”
“Liquidity expansion will continue to drive the cycle for the foreseeable future, creating risk of a violent correction particularly in emerging markets, gold and other commodities.”
Boeckh says the Fed can see the froth, but doesn’t care: “It will err on the side of excess liquidity in order to deal with the more sensitive problem of high unemployment.” Furthermore, letting banks and consumers rebuild their balance sheets through reflation in the value of their assets is good for everyone in the short term.
In my opinion Gold is moving more due to it's take up as a monetary/reserve role (by India, China, Sri Lanka, Russia), and as a safehaven from paper currencies, not because commodities will do well from stimulus $ (although it's probably a contributor), I think this will become more obvious as Gold rises a lot more strongly than other commodity based assets over the next couple of years.Quant easing and a devaluing USD. The US economy is still in dire straights, regardless of pending resets. They're going to be over-stimulatory for all of 2010 and maybe a touch more. Commodity bubbles will ensue...
Stock market (US & here), house prices (US & here & elsewhere).Priced into what keithj?
Why not ? The stock market looks ahead by 12 months or so... its' level today is closely based on what the market thinks will be justified in 12 months time.I would say the general stock markets do not accurately reflect the danger that awaits, if you'd asked me at the March lows I might have agreed it was priced in, but not after a 50% rally.
OK, so if we accept that houses are being kept off the market to 'artificially' keep prices high, then that is the reality. So why put that fact in a different basket from other facts... like the fact that house prices have risen in the US for the last 5 months ? My mate is keeping one of his IPs off the market until prices get better - is that artificial or reality ? Who cares - the end result is what is important... and this is that US prices have been rising for 5 months, in sharp contrast to the previous 18 months.Has US housing priced it in? Possibly, but there is a lot of housing on the sidelines being kept off the market artificially by the US banks to avoid their assets being revalued and because more stock on the market will drive prices down further...
I'd agree, v. few members of the public would be aware of Option ARMS resets, and v. few of them have any control over the level of house prices or stock markets. However, the people that matter (with the big $$$) will be v. aware of the implications & will have priced it in.How much mainstream attention is there to the upcoming resets? Enough for the retail investor to be fully aware of the implications? Do a test yourself...ask around some friends whether they have heard of either subprime or option arms mortgages...do you think they will have heard of both?
lol that's a pretty big generalisation. Where did you read that?Why not ? The stock market looks ahead by 12 months or so... its' level today is closely based on what the market thinks will be justified in 12 months time.
The people with the big/smart $ are either selling (google "insider selling") or in the case of large investment banks they will ride the trend with their program/high frequency trading systems which give them the advantage which ever way the market is going. Otherwise what big $ are you talking about?However, the people that matter (with the big $$$) will be v. aware of the implications & will have priced it in.
Yep, it's a generalisation, and it generally correct.lol that's a pretty big generalisation. Where did you read that?
This is one of those comments that makes things seem either black or white..... You appear to be saying that the market was wrong in March, so it can never be trusted to be right. I'd be more inclined to generalise and say that historically the market has been more right than wrong, and that's likely in this case too.I guess they got it pretty wrong in March this year, as well as the peak in 2007, if that's the case...
'insider selling' found 40M+ results, was there one in particular that you though relevant to this debate on the expiry of Option ARMs ?The people with the big/smart $ are either selling (google "insider selling")...
... and are therefore irrelevant to this debate.... or in the case of large investment banks they will ride the trend with their program/high frequency trading systems which give them the advantage which ever way the market is going.
Anyone with $100M+ to invest somewhere. Your average Ma & Pa commsec trader (who knows nothing about Option ARMs) doesn't move the market much. It's the smart guys (who are fully aware of Option ARMs reset dates) with the big $$$ that do... and they appear to be saying she'll be right regardless of some peoples single minded fear of a known known.Otherwise what big $ are you talking about?
I'm not sure how to answer this.
There are two components a direct (answering your opinion) and an indirect (whats the effect on my investments).
To answer the first:
i dont think there is a high probability of a 2nd leg down. How can we get a 2nd leg down, if the leg is still on the floor. Sure we are seeing potential greenshoots, but greenshoots are just that: indications that things maybe turning for the better. Dont tell me we are going to see another period like November to March (from an economic point of view, not with regards to any asset classes).
Look at the drop in trade figures during this time, look at the freezing of finance. There was a period here that was really scarey. I dont know if anyone watched the latest Warren Buffet interview on cnbc asia (i posted it somewhere in this forum), but he said that there was a brief period where big business was at risk of performing basic business like issuing payrolls through the banks.
From current levels we are not going to see some of the drastic quotes that we saw in recent times, like trade figures down 30-40% in a month (especially as over time these will be from lower bases).
To answer the second:
It will depend on the relationship between actual performance and expected performance. The higher asset classes move in the anticipation of better expected performance, the greater the chance of disappointment if things dont turn out as expected. So many people fail to understand this key point.
All my investment energy is being directed based on the assumption that we are in for a 'L' type recovery (but try to get that 'L' on a slowly upwards moving projectionary, i can't type it here cause there is no symbol, but basically its not flat, just moving up slowly from the bottom).
Why am i investing this way?
Well if it turns out to be a 'v' recovery then i will still do nicely. If it doesnt then my investment strategies are not predicting 'blue sky', and hence there is not much room for disappointment in the market, and hence my investments shouldnt be shot down (at least not from the point at which i purchased the investment).
If i highlight two things for this forum:
1) dont understimate mankinds ability to adapt to his circumstances
2) dont understimate the ability of capitalism to direct its efforts towards making profit.
These two characteristics have served us well over the centuries, always have always will.
Future profit will probably not come from the sources that generated profit in the near term past, especially if we are in for a time of structural change, but profit will be made, its up to people to research where those profits will come from. Those that successfully identify the profit catalysts will do very nicely, regardless of the times.
I should also state, there is a very good reason why the financial community has truisms such as the market climbs a wall of worry. This applies to most stages of a market cycle but is more pronounced after a severe bear market.
For what its worth im actually pretty content with the recent pullback in the share market, its healthy and provides the base for future returns.
The share market over the next year or so is going to fluctuate between times of relief and times of worry.
The relief will come when they see that things are improving.
The worry will come when they see the historical economic figures and unemployment continue to rise, or when the market has a upwards spurt (when then needs to be justified by actual performance).
The other key issue that i cant emphasise strongly enough, market returns will be dictated by actual results (both economic and stock market specific) vs expectations.
Right now forget the media reports about oil comming down being bad for the sharemarkets as a whole, the latest unemployment figure in the US being unexpectedly large, these are all just operational figures (as opposed to strategic). The key reason why the markets are having a correction is the fear that they run up too hard too fast, so they are looking for any excuse to correct downwards.
This is a cat and mouse game between greed and fear.
'insider selling' found 40M+ results, was there one in particular that you though relevant to this debate on the expiry of Option ARMs?
Oh really?... and are therefore irrelevant to this debate.
Anyone with $100M+ to invest somewhere. Your average Ma & Pa commsec trader (who knows nothing about Option ARMs) doesn't move the market much. It's the smart guys (who are fully aware of Option ARMs reset dates) with the big $$$ that do... and they appear to be saying she'll be right regardless of some peoples single minded fear of a known known.
hobo-jo;614392 Oh really? :rolleyes: What investors with $100m+ are sinking their dollars into the general market at these levels? Can you name one? ...[/QUOTE said:i believe that Warren Buffett placed very large equity purchase orders over the last 18 odd months.
I can tell you as well that alot of 'old money' wealthy investors were buying into the Australian market heavily earlier this year.
In regards to hedge funds:
you need to realise that on the whole they take short term positions with a goal of making 'fast profits'. This is often achieved with heavy leverage.
So their tactical asset allocation is rarely suitable for a retail investor.