While our housing needs are going up by around 270,000 dwellings a year, and we're building around 210,000 a year, I can't see why the construction industry would be going down in a hurry.
tubs,
it's very very very easy to go under in a hot market.
look at collier homes in the 80s. huge housing boom. took on a hundred contracts a month. slabs down. wait, too many slabs down. sh1t. quick, close the doors to new business. oh crap - um, where do we get the trades to finish these? uh oh - mum and dad lose their "land with slab" to the bank thanks to it taking 9 months after slabs down to get bricks on site.
or
average times. average builder potters along, 10, 15, 20 houses a month. doing well. interst rates cut. business picks up for all builders. land release in boondocks. 10 houses signed to build in boondocks. 10 more houses. slabs down. brickies won't drive out there. brickies that do, leave site because mortar sand is on opposite side of block to bricks and pick a site with "better conditions". brick prices jump. steel price jumps. brickie labour jumps 2 fold. builder signed buyer on fixed price contract, allowing room to move for price increases. price increase hit builder - erode margins from 35% to 5%. builder's profit eroded 60%. builder folds. homes sales still booming. new housing shortage. another builder folds.
while fixed price contracts are great for the home buyer, they are a deathknell for a builder if price rises get away from them. then the buyer is left with a half finished house and gets a spot on Today Tonight. so if the fixed price contract REALLY worth it?