How much can people really earn?

Can someone please pass me the popcorn.

BTW Melbourne is going great guns.

BTW 100k isn't what it used to be.
 
Simple buddy-its easy to talk, but less harder to proove eh....

Simply one Seek advert would be sufficient thanks :)

Oh BTW, mcuh like the amount of girls young guys says they have slept with you should learn to talk such talk of wages with a grain of salt :D

Everyones is bigger, faster and more exensive than everyone elses lol

Thats because Seek doesnt cover these roles. Simple as that.

And deltaberry is actually selling the earning potential of some of these people very, very (very!!) short.

Very very old and inaccurate survey but it paints the picture dunno:

http://www.jmes.com.au/PDFs/Salary Survey 2005.pdf

The top end firms will be at the top end of that range in decent years (obviously not FY08/09 but before and after yes).

Look at a specialist recruiter:

http://www.jmes.com.au/

and also a "seek" front end website for such roles:

http://jobs.efinancialcareers.com.au/Investment_Banking_|_M_A.htm

Your posts dunno are fully of envy. Not a healthy emotion. A google search can bring all this up, its not that secret or a big deal.

And delta also probably sells the workload and life sacrifices very short too!! These roles are a MASSIVE personal sacrifice.
 
trogdor - no one said anything about 'earning potential'

Cheers
Aussie

Sorry aussie, not sure I follow your post?

The lower end analyst roles on the salary survey are what grads were paid in 2005. Similarly for everbody else up the food chain. Not potential but fact.

Im just trying to show that the original poster was on the money in his ballpark figures for the sector (except of course for the amazingly bad 2008/9 year).

By the way base salaries at top tiers at the lower end are up a lot from 2005 levels.
 
High paying jobs come down to a personal choice. Do you want to sacrifice your time for more money? If so, then good luck to you. Some people aren't willing to make that sacrifice and that's fine as well
 
I find it interesting. I can tell you my experience from IT.

I've worked in top tier IT firms, Oracle, IBM, Accenture, etc. I also have many friends in other consulting organisations such as Oakton, DWS, etc.

In 2000/2001 a Grad starting salary was $38-40k for a fresh 21 year old Bachelor degree.

Today I'd guess it's maybe $45-50k?

If they stay in the same company for the entire period as a regular permanent employee they'd may or may not crack $100k by the age of 30.

If people did change companies or started contracting they could easily crack $100k, which could happen at age 25-26.

That's pretty valid. Even more for contractors.
 
Sorry trogdor maybe we are looking at different things - i couldnt see the bit that states first year out of undergard university...

I think overall this thread is not so much about Invesment banking - yes those salarioes are achiveable - its all the other stuff too...

And Yes davidMc I agree that after 3 years the sky can be the limit....just not first year out of undergraduate university
 
High paying jobs come down to a personal choice. Do you want to sacrifice your time for more money? If so, then good luck to you. Some people aren't willing to make that sacrifice and that's fine as well

Absolutely true, and as you would imagine, even more applicable at the higher ends, where the sacrifices can be unimaginable.
 
I am have been reading this thread...LMAO!!!:p

I reckon Deltaberry and DeeHwa (as Aussie said maybe the same!)......have taken serious drugs.

In most professions one does not start on a 100K....and wait attitudes like Deltaberry and DeeHwa they are unlikely to last in any of the bluechips. Their people skills are not there and they don't want high maintenance Gen Ys.

I have been in IT for about 19 years.....and having worked for a top tier consulting firm (DeeHwa may not think so)....100K is still reasonable money in IT and you don't get that out of school. You can get that in a specialised skill in 3 years - i.e. SAP, Siebel, etc. but you level out at say 120-130K and you get more only as a contractor.

Typically in the IT industry....the easiest jobs to find are in the 75k-100K range, followed by 40-75K range, then the 100-140K range, and anything over 150k you have to be reasonably experienced or have a very specific skillset.
 
Sorry trogdor maybe we are looking at different things - i couldnt see the bit that states first year out of undergard university...

I think overall this thread is not so much about Invesment banking - yes those salarioes are achiveable - its all the other stuff too...

And Yes davidMc I agree that after 3 years the sky can be the limit....just not first year out of undergraduate university

Sure aussie. Agreed -I'm just pointing out that the original poster has a point when he says that the general populace doesnt believe grads can earn such money, and that in that specific sector most grads are on that money.

Grads are in investment banking known as "analysts". That is a grad who has just finished an undergrad degree (albiet a double degree u/g degree with top of class marks)

After typically 3 years they would become an "Associate" (at US banks and some similar variant titles at Euro / other banks in Australia), then 2 or 3 more a VP, and then if very very good, lucky etc. a director.

Its very very much up or out, so if anybody has been there 3 years and hasnt left or been fired they would be an associate.

Delta - completely agree about the 50 year olds. Its called envy, but to be honest for most people if they tried it for a few months even if they could handle it wouldnt want to do it, notwithstanding the money.

Anyway, a bit of a silly discussion, but remember you can pretty much dig up data on google for anything!!! :)
 
Delta - completely agree about the 50 year olds. Its called envy, but to be honest for most people if they tried it for a few months even if they could handle it wouldnt want to do it, notwithstanding the money.


There are exceptions to evey single situation. The O.P was giving the impression that it is common place for 1st year grads to earn $100k first year. This is just not true.

How you excuse someone disagreeing with what is clearly a false statement as being envious is hilarious...is stupid at the same time.

That asside anyone paying some snotty nose kid with no experiance $100k to be spoon fed has rocks in their head...
 
There are exceptions to evey single situation. The O.P was giving the impression that it is common place for 1st year grads to earn $100k first year. This is just not true.

Yeah. That's the impression they gave me. Remember employees are just helping the company to generate income. In theory, the wage should be less than what the employee helps the company to earn (sure there are exception).

Sure, there are couple earning 200K+. But how many people are in the wages range. Remember, some/lots of grad cannot even find a job in their fields too.

Technically, buying a 1 mil property is achieveable. But it is not really easy to achieve without hard effort.
 
Yeah. That's the impression they gave me. Remember employees are just helping the company to generate income. In theory, the wage should be less than what the employee helps the company to earn (sure there are exception).

Sure, there are couple earning 200K+. But how many people are in the wages range. Remember, some/lots of grad cannot even find a job in their fields too.

Technically, buying a 1 mil property is achieveable. But it is not really easy to achieve without hard effort.

Nope never said it was the norm but it is achievable by a sufficient number of people. As I said, my view was that there're enough of these people around and enough overseas intersets who think this place is undervalued - but then again last time I said this the next response was I think "pass the popcorn around"
 
Nope never said it was the norm but it is achievable by a sufficient number of people. As I said, my view was that there're enough of these people around and enough overseas intersets who think this place is undervalued - but then again last time I said this the next response was I think "pass the popcorn around"

I don't mean that was your comment. Actually, that was someone's else comment.

Overseas money comes and go.

I think someone else comment about prices in Asia. The population in Asia is really high. In my opinion, comparing Australia and Asia is just like comparing an apple with an orange.
 
are you an agent?

curious to find out what kind of jobs people at mid 20s are doing earning 6 figure salaries of 250K?


I'm of the view that while landed property is still cheap in Melbourne, apartments are far from cheap.

In relation to property prices in Manhattan, you can buy a studio in say Chelsea for US$350k-$400k, which stacks up well against what you can get an apartment in Melbourne for - I'd much rather have an apartment in Manhattan than Melbourne. But when it comes to land, Melbourne is cheap in comparison.
 
Thanks for validating. A single degree takes 3 years. You start at 18, graduate at 21. From 21 to 26 is around 5 years. Many crack the 6-digit by that age.

To be fair, I didn't validate it.

I thought the original comment from you was that many grads fresh out of uni can earn $100k ('most/all of your friends' = many grads).

I think 5 years is about as quick as you could do it in IT, regardless of employer.
 
The difference is that Melbourne is at the bottom of Australia (its not the a#se h#&^ of the earth but you can see it from there) and London/New York is well...London & New York.

If you have spent time overseas you'll know how insignificant Australia and its major cities really are on the world stage.

To me, that's the big difference.
 
I started working in IT 15 years ago in another country on $100 a month at today's conversion (yes... $100 a MONTH!) and I wouldn't have fathomed earning a 6-digit "$" salary... but now I'm working on it!

Different people have different reasons in accepting/staying with their jobs... as long as they are happy and contented, good on them! At least they're not bludgers! :D
 
Last edited:
are you an agent?

curious to find out what kind of jobs people at mid 20s are doing earning 6 figure salaries of 250K?

An Agent?? Are you kidding me - what kind of agent reckons apartments are overpriced?

And I never said anything about $250k salaries. Any reference I made to 6 figures means $100k to perhaps $150k.
 
Back
Top