So on what basis do you base you assertion on the inner west on? You've made it very clear that at the moment inner city is the best investment cycle and anyone who invests in Hoppers or Werribee are pretty much idiots and wasting there time. As has been asked before, what is your property strategy.
No, I did not say at the moment inner city is the best investment cycle. In fact, you asking the question of my property strategy is already a contradiction because otherwise, that would have been my strategy my Pickle Pickle friend. I did not in fact assert anything. All I basically said, as you pointed out elaborately, is that property investment in Werribee and Hoppers is poor, period.
I'm still trying to work out my strategy but it is based on the buy and hold method. I must say Werribee does appeal to me a bit as the prices are good and the location is quite good and it is only about 30 minutes by train to the city. Purely on location from the city and freeway access I think Werribee is like Dandenong, except you can get to city quicker by train from Werribee. I can see Weribee becoming more expensive than Dandenong and if that happens then I believe investors in Werribee would have done well and would be very happy.
I also have a bias for buy and hold. The only exception is buy, develop and sell. I am Chinese, so asset accumulation is very important in our wealth building philosophy. Werribee is a bargain hunter's suburb and this means that only cheapskates buy there. This gives rise to a fundamental problem - lack of emotional premium and hence, subdued capital growth in my opinion. Also, as I have highlighted on numerous times, capital growth is often an illusion because everything else has gone up as well. The key is to exceed the capital growth in your subsequent purchase or in the next asset class you wish to buy into. How is a place like Werribee going to achieve that when it is plagued by bargain hunters who only buy with their heads, and not their hearts? Again...it is emotional premium, remember it!
As for your arguments about the inner city, it sounds like to me a bit like the dot com boom. Don't worry about the income that the asset gets, but only worry about the capital growth. If the rents in the inner city aren't growing (I don't know enough about this to really comment) at a similar rate as CG, then the CG will eventually slow down or even reverse. I accept that inner city places do have lower yields than outer suburbs, but let's say the yield is at 3% at the moment, if the yield goes to 1% and rents don't rise quickly enough, I can't see the CG continuing. I'm sure you will be able to keep telling me about great gains in the inner city, but great short term gains in isolation raises more questions and it answers. Dot.com companies had great short term gains. Not saying that inner city will loose a lot of there gains (don't know enough about inner city properties to comment), but if you are going to talk up inner city properties and bag the hell out of the outer suburbs and people who invest in the outer suburbs, then at least show some evidence that the CG are based on fundementals (IE. rents are increasing).
I won't even start to discuss/argue what you just said but let me highlight one thing. History has shown that capital gains do continue despite low yields and I don't see a reason why it can't continue into the future. People buy inner city, inner east, east etc. because of emotional premium and because it is a home and not just a house. That is where the capital growth is. At the end of the day, there are more owner occupiers than investors. Capital growth is not always based on fundamentals...that is a huge myth and if you believe everything is based on fundamentals and requires a scientific explanation...then you have completely misunderstood the concept of irrational human psychology.
As asked before answer the question about your property strategy.
My property strategy is multi-faceted and too detailed to explain. Maybe we can catch up for coffee, haha, if you really want to know the details. Anyways, to summarise, I think people will increasingly be priced out of the east, inner east, south east, bayside etc. yet there is huge stigma associated with the west so I think people (especially generation Y's) will buy up in the north as the next best (hence why I bought in Brunswick). There is a reason why places like Northcote, Fairfield have completely rocketed. If you so value my advice, then I would suggest investing in the next ring of northern suburbs (depending on affordability) which would be Coburg, Preston, Thornbury and Pascoe Vale South. Otherwise, buy up in Coburg North, Reservoir, Lower Plenty with the extent up to Fawkner. These are for houses btw... I have other strategies for other dwelling types but would be too long to discuss here.