Two comments, whether or not to the point.
I asked earlier whether Steve's system was mechanical enough to be back proven against existing data. I haven't seen an answer, but it was a curiousity question, not a burning issue. The idea of comparing it to BillL's though is specious. BillL's certainly does have a level of judgement and it starts with what stocks to pick. As a result, picking blue chips for him invalidates the result. It'd be like doing the same to Thommo, who (I get the impression) doesn't have that much to do with blue chip stocks.
The other point comes down to respect, regardless of legal threats. At one stage I felt that my integrity was being threatened/criticised and I responded. The person in question assured me that it was not his/her intention to do so and that (more or less) was that.
We can't see each other's faces (except these ones
) and so netiquette is crucial. Try it, you'll love the reponse.
And while I'm sharing the love around, Steve, could we have less bolding and fewer capitals? It's like trying to read Brad Sugars
, it hurts my eyes.
Conciliatory smilie --->