serviceability different for rent from a managed property rather than private rental?

Hi folks - title says it all. Was wondering if there is an advantage in the eyes of the bank if your investment property is managed by a real estate agent. I have been asked in the past when applying for a loan, so I assume the rental income is treated differently if it is self managed? Thank you in advance for any replies.
 
The assessment policy on the income is the same. The difference is in proving how much you're earning because the banks can't rely on a regular rental statement. Instead they'll accept a copy of the lease agreement, or a minimum of 3 months of direct and easily identifiable rental deposits into your account.

They'll still only take 80% of the actual income (or whatever their policy is). They don't recognize the fact that you're not paying a property manager.

It could actually be argued that the cost of self managing is actually higher. You'll spend more time managing a property or two than a property manager would. Self managed properties are more likely to have bad tenants. The cost may be cheaper for many people who do it well, but a lot of people aren't very good at being landlords.
 
No difference between self managed/professionally managed. The same income verification is completed, which for the most part a lease agreement is sufficient.

A side note, you'll find a lot of landlord insurance policies differentiate between self managed and professionally managed properties - generally with a higher premium for self managed, or possible policy exclusions/exceptions. Always good to read what your policy covers.
 
Last edited:
Pretty much the only difference will be with the way it is evidenced.

Banks statements showing consistent payments coming in as well as a signed lease agreement if it is private.

If it is managed through an agent the two most recent rent statements will suffice.
 
Agent fees are a % of income. Thats a fairly insignificant proportion of total rental.

Interest is a similar % but based upon the debt not the income.

Its like comparing 5% with 5% of 5%....or 5% v's .0025%.
 
As others have said - with self managing, you'll need to show regular credits to an account and a valid tenancy agreement. Even if you're savings a few dollars - the bank won't recognise this and will simply take a percentage of the gross (usually 80%)

Cheers

Jamie
 
Back
Top