I should have gone for the fibreglass pool option rather than the concrete one.
Concrete pools have waterproofing. Google it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I should have gone for the fibreglass pool option rather than the concrete one.
Concrete pools have waterproofing. Google it.
Can you show me where the waterproofing is on these concrete structures subject to water pooling against the surface?
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=...ChiAeNxICoAQ&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1521&bih=685
pinkboy
If a property has been presented to me as a buyer in a certain state, I expect that property to be in the same state when I settle- apart from fair wear and tear. If it's going to cost me money to bring it back to that state then I should be able to claim that cost.
But to hold back money because some leaves had dropped into a gutter and the grass had grown in the weeks leading up to the settlement, especially know the vendors were overseas and really being "held to ransom" just does't sit well with me. I gather I'm not alone in that.
I just find it petty and something I'd never do.
You really should get a dilmah and read through the RTA link Dazz put forward!
pinkboy
I doubt the RTA link would provide me any information about concrete.
I just wouldn't have done it. Others said the same, and I'm wondering why you did ask the question when you seemed hellbent on doing it anyway, even after most people suggested it wasn't the right thing to do.
Need your advice. Settlement on Brisbane IP tomorrow. Pre-settlement inspection was conducted yesterday. Almost everything was in the same condition as at the building inspection which is good news except:
a) the grass has not been cut
b) the shallow drains at the front of the house are filling up with leaf litter and debris
The drains need to be cleared otherwise the ground floor may flood
The backyard of the property has lots of rocks -- a landscaping feature by the former owners so the grass has to be cut mainly by edge trimmer (instead of lawn mower)
Is it possible to deduct $250 from the sale price at settlement because the current owners/managing agent have not maintained the grounds adequately?
I should mention that the owners have moved to USA for some time now. At least half a year. They are not present in Australia to do the grounds maintenance. The tenants they had in their absence did the grounds maintenance but I think since October, the owners have had the house empty and no tenants so their agent could more easily do showings to sell the house.
Appreciate any advice on what's fair to do, thanks!
The drains, I should add are immediately in front of the house, the moment you step out the door, you step on the grates of the drain. Our building inspector did the pre-settlement inspection and warned us that if the drains are not cleared, water would flow straight into the house in a heavy downpour 'cos the drains are choked.
So it's not such a ridiculous issue at all, I'd hate to be slapped with a huge damage/insurance bill right after we took possession. Insurance probably would not even pay because they would say it's our fault for not doing grounds maintenance.
Wow, this one is still going.
I think Beanie Girl acknowledged about 4 pages ago that she realised keeping on top of the drains was going to be her responsibility. She might share with people the name of her building inspector - he seems to have been on his game that day.
Holding back $250 at settlement might seem petty, but I have read of landlords doing things even more petty - the most recent string that comes to mind was the one titled something like 'What's the tightest thing you have done as a landlord in 2013?'
Probably also worth noting that from what I can tell in the thread Beanie Girl now has 4 properties under her belt. That's 4 more than a lot of people.
Should the plural of spouse actually be spice? ;-)I reckon there'd be spouses...
Should the plural of spouse actually be spice? ;-)
Thanks.Giggle!
Geoff, you're terrible!
But your play on words is fantastic! (lou_e - li_e)
Are you a Lit major?
Your quick wit on word association is marvellous.
Should the plural of spouse actually be spice? ;-)