So Dazz

You paint a vivid picture TPFKAD


I could almost imagine the Daz express thundering through, big solid and chunky

317629055_ac68b2dada_o.jpg
10-4 there Bandit, looks like we got us a convoy!!! ;) :p :D
 
For the sake of argument lets pretend that I found an asphalt pad in Rocklea that I could rent to the Commonwealth govt on a 10% net yield for 10 years.

Could I get 100% LVR on that?
If you bought it vacant, boomtown, then yes, you probably could borrow 100%...

What you do is buy it from a former owner-occupier who hasn't bothered signing up a tenant. As you probably know, commercial properties with no tenants are worth a lot less - the value of a commercial property's all about the lease/tenant. Let's say that you could buy such a property for, say, $1M. But then, prior to settlement, you sign up your government tenant willing to pay $100K per year for 10 years, and you take that to your commercial valuer. The commercial valuer says that based on an average 6% cap rate in that area, because you now have a $100K pa lease, your property is now worth $1.67M. Then you go to the lender with the $1.67M valuation, and borrow the $1M to buy the property, and you only need to borrow 60% LVR to cover 100% of the purchase cost. Then you just sit back and take profits...

Simple, hey? ;)

No I haven't done this! :D What can I say? It sounds a lot easier when you say it quick. But I do know several people who have employed this strategy, so it's definitely doable.
 
probably harder in this market though ozperp. would be a lot easier when people's cashflow etc are going quite well.
 
probably harder in this market though ozperp. would be a lot easier when people's cashflow etc are going quite well.
I would have thought "swings and roundabouts"... It's probably easier to buy vacant commercial properties at a discount at the moment, I would think, but also more difficult to sign up premium tenants on strong rents. But if you buy a property that's ideally suited to a particular premium tenant, I think you could possibly swing these factors in your favour.... ie buy at a discount but still get a strong tenant.
 
Ideally have the tenant lined up before looking or commiting to the property....an exit strategy of sorts for the funding negotiations.

Easier said than done, and I've only ever read about such scenarios.
 
hi boomtown
sorry to say your question is like a chinese person saying if I bought a 2br unit in australia will I get 10% growth
the answer is yes
the trouble is where in aust
whats the rent for the area and a whole load of other questions and would take 5 pages to list.
for a start I would not buy vacant land anywhere not even rural land.
sorry if it had a tenament maybe but thats different.
can you get 100% finance on commercial
well can you get 100% finance on resi
the answer to both is yes
you just have to buy at 65% of true market val
and refinance no rocket science there.
but how is that done
now thats a very different.
if the question is can it be done
the answer is yes
if the question is how is it done very different
and you for one have my number and you know its not for a board
there are lender out there still in the market fewer yes but still there.
but for me I would look at resi at the moment and have a good read of sitloti and this is the ideal time to do duel investing
and with duel investing yes 100% lender is not only possible currently its the only way I see to get 100% funding
and by all means ask away
you will see from last time I will not get into anything todo with my companies nor am I interested in going into formulars or layering but
in answer to your question can you get 100% funding the simple answer is yes
not sure about the vacant block of land
I have not nor would I think of buying one buts thats me as I want embedded equity thats equity from day one
not cash flow thou thats possible but equity.
because thou alot of people keep saying that cash is king
for me thats not true
for me equity is king to cash by a 100 miles as you can use equity where you can't use cash
but you can use equity when ever you need cash
and thats a very big difference and if you do not understand that well all I can say is start to learn
equity is alot more powerful then cash and does not cost the interest or loss of earnings that cash does.
get to understand equity and how to use it and when you understand it and how to use it
you will find that 100% lending is very possible in resi and comm.
but again thats a very long post.
oh and the ,,, ...



still apply
as I have still not got any better at posting.
if I look at your 10% deal the answer is yes
I would do 70% at 4.5% and the 30% at 15%
so say its 1 mil
70% at 4.5% thats 31.5% for 3 years fixed
and 300k at 15% thats 45k
so thats 76.5k and you gat 100k so 23.5 k and thats could be taken up by the mezz but I don't think so they would leave that as the buffer.
so simple answer would be yes
but there are a few hoops to jump thru
 
Gotcha GR - your posts are spot on as always.

My family did mezz back in the 80s when credit was hard. Haven't needed it since but time to put it back in the playbook.
 
hi boomtown
mezz for some reason has been given the bad paint brush but it has been used for along time.
people think of mezz as westpoint etc
but mezz is just vanilla finance and is very usefull if done right
I as you know like mezz as its a high income earner and also can get you over the lending numbers so for people that don't understand it have a read.
and just incase you think I will be changing my name the answer is no.
nor am I going to get anybetter at the ,,,...///''';;;?? for that matter
 
Well well....look who's dragged himself out of the woodwork...

March 2007 since your last substantial post saucy, which incidentally was to attack me.

You must be worth at least a billion by now with your vast sideline knowledge saucy. Pray tell - have you bought any property yet ??

Astound me with your theories saucy. I do so enjoy a good yarn.

"Dazzling"

All things must pass

seizure in a year or so :D
 
Well well....look who's dragged himself out of the woodwork...

March 2007 since your last substantial post saucy, which incidentally was to attack me.

You must be worth at least a billion by now with your vast sideline knowledge saucy. Pray tell - have you bought any property yet ??

Astound me with your theories saucy. I do so enjoy a good yarn.

For what its worth Dazz, you are still an insperation to many on this board including myself. At the end of the day, please remember that this is a public board, who knows the real identity/motive of posters.

Its a bit like politics, whilst the silent majority might support a view an absasive person/poster can persist in reflecting a viewpoint that isnt representative of the population of people that read your posts for insperation.

Afterall at the end of the day many of the more experienced posters give their experiences/advice/opinions free grata. Last time i checked we are not being asked for $5000 fees for turbo charged investment advice:D.

Thanks again to you and the other long time members on this forum (special personal thanks to Keith for some of his posts which i will explain in the years to come if things work out for me)
 
You paint a vivid picture TPFKAD


I could almost imagine the Daz express thundering through, big solid and chunky

317629055_ac68b2dada_o.jpg


whereas we are still at this stage

1450647324_db8819ddaf.jpg


I for one enjoy your posts TPFKAD and am amazed at what you've done to date its certainly food for thought, congratulations, hope your semi-retirement kicks in soon as well


Haha i love this one.
 
Back
Top