Hi ppl,
A couple of the old workers cottages I've been looking at in inner city Melbourne have had their wooden floors removed and concrete poured in place. The house had then been carpeted/tiled. Speaking to an agent at one of the places today, he reckons it's not ideal because these places have blue stone foundations and were designed to have some airflow under the house. Might have contributed to some rising damp which was noticeable in some parts.
I'm a bit put off by it, firstly because I love the look of aged polished boards and secondly because I'd ideally like to install something like hydronic heating and I figured the pipes would be routed under the boards.
What other disadvantages are there to this type of floor? Are there alternatives other than carpet/tiles?
Thanks in advance!
A couple of the old workers cottages I've been looking at in inner city Melbourne have had their wooden floors removed and concrete poured in place. The house had then been carpeted/tiled. Speaking to an agent at one of the places today, he reckons it's not ideal because these places have blue stone foundations and were designed to have some airflow under the house. Might have contributed to some rising damp which was noticeable in some parts.
I'm a bit put off by it, firstly because I love the look of aged polished boards and secondly because I'd ideally like to install something like hydronic heating and I figured the pipes would be routed under the boards.
What other disadvantages are there to this type of floor? Are there alternatives other than carpet/tiles?
Thanks in advance!