I disagree. You can't rule out apartments and units all together.
True, it is the student accommodation and highrise developments I really mean't.
Yes holding all other factors constant the higher the land component of your investment the greater your capital growth. However, if you do your research, identify and purchase an apartment below market value or you do a small renovation to add value there's your capital growth right there.
Um, if you purchase units and houses below market value and renovate the investor can also achieve capital growth.
Apartments that have something unique about them like an amazing view can also achieve high capital growth, in some situations much higher than a house. Which would experience more capital growth: an apartment with panoramic beach views or a house on a large block in the outer suburbs? Proximity to train stations, the city, the beach, parks, shopping strips, schools and universities etc will also drive growth. Scarcity will drive growth.
Um, units and houses in a great location will also return excellent capital growth and you can't subdivide an apartment.
I would avoid high rise apartment towers BUT an apartment or unit in a small boutique block in an area with a high proportion of owner occupiers can make a good investment for both capital growth and income.
Yep
To the OP I'd say that you have to do your math. You can't just look at a property as a property. It isn't a house. It isn't an apartment. It's an investment. It's future cash flow. What you pay for something comes down to future earning potential. You need to form an opinion about what you believe the future earning potential of the properties you look at will be. Then you need to compare them against each other and against what you could earn from other investments. Sometimes I think people forget the math.
I have no property investing experience either so obviously listen to the more experienced people on here over me!