Appeal of BCC Enforcement Notice for "alleged contravention of a condition in the building development approval and the alleged use of the premises for a purpose that is not a lawful use" upheld by Building and Development Dispute Resolution Committee. BCC tried to use the 2012 AAD decision to help support their argument but it didn't.
http://www.hpw.qld.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/Final Decision 12-13.pdf
I am familiar with this decision.
This was purely a technicality based on evidence as opposed to intent that invalidated the Enforcement Notice issued. Council would be free to issue another Enforcement Notice the next day, assuming they had the appropriate evidence.
It doesn't deal with the substantive matter at all.
My understanding is that the Brisbane City Council is instructing a Silk and a Junior Barrister to run a test case to ensure that they have clear Court authority for their definition of the House Code. BCC would not be expending such large sums of money if they were not against these uses.