likewow said:
Damn - nice...very nice.
Good bloke.
<KS>
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
likewow said:
quiggles said:I see a problem with the model. I never bothered to raise it with the Investors Club (at least not more than once, the blank looks were quite enough).
Taking property 1, value 100k, 10 years later it's $200k so you draw down 80% of the available equity. Now you have to service that equity, and we'll assume that the 7% is a pretty low guesstimate - and we'll further assume tht you can lock it in for 10 years. Now you can pay cash, or capitalise the loan. If you capitalise the loan, and the property grows at 7% over the decade, you wind up with a property valued at $400k, on which you owe 80% - yes, that's right, your debt compounded too. so no draw down.
Ok, instead of that you decide to pay it off (I/O) so you draw down $80k and spend $74.4K, while the other 5.6K goes to the bank. Next year, you go to IP 2, and draw down around 85k (80k+7%) and spend $73.4K while around 11.6k (5.6k +(5.6k+7%))goes to the bank - any guesses where you're at in year 10?
And anything you've spent on living is not tax deductible, and if this is your only source of income, you have no tax deductions anyway.
Now before you jump all over me, yes, I've ignored the rents but if you go to Somers' work you'll find that the rents where cap growth is good tend to be poor (much lower than interest rates) and equally I've ignored any expenses on the properties. Now honestly, apart from deductions against other income, how much does each property return? - you can add that to the pot of income, but I don't think it does much except delay the inevitable. OTOH, the cash you are drawing down (but not rents) is also vulnerable to inflation.
And if interest rises, capgrowth will slow, at least to begin with and maybe even a whole property cycle won't be enough to save you, especially if the cash runs out.
Happy to hear your thoughts.
/me feels seriously intimidated but your grouped wealth of knowledge, and plans a way to milk you for all you will share on the 27th
dtraeger2k said:Hi,
Im not sure how any of you could go past Clarkson,
QUOTE]
Nice spruiking Dave
I agree that an extension of the freeway will make the place seem more attractive to a lot of people. Not sure it will become CF+ in the near future.
I hope all is well with all of you in Perth.
Hello from Dongara
TheBacon
dtraeger2k said:Im not sure how any of you could go past Clarkson, it's certainly not cashflow +ve but then again, what is?
Keen said:Can someone give me more details on the Perth meeting as my brother and I are keen to meet like minded people.
Thanks
Keen
quiggles said:I see a problem with the model. I never bothered to raise it with the Investors Club (at least not more than once, the blank looks were quite enough).
Taking property 1, value 100k, 10 years later it's $200k so you draw down 80% of the available equity. Now you have to service that equity, and we'll assume that the 7% is a pretty low guesstimate - and we'll further assume tht you can lock it in for 10 years. Now you can pay cash, or capitalise the loan. If you capitalise the loan, and the property grows at 7% over the decade, you wind up with a property valued at $400k, on which you owe 80% - yes, that's right, your debt compounded too. so no draw down.
Ok, instead of that you decide to pay it off (I/O) so you draw down $80k and spend $74.4K, while the other 5.6K goes to the bank. Next year, you go to IP 2, and draw down around 85k (80k+7%) and spend $73.4K while around 11.6k (5.6k +(5.6k+7%))goes to the bank - any guesses where you're at in year 10?
And anything you've spent on living is not tax deductible, and if this is your only source of income, you have no tax deductions anyway.
Now before you jump all over me, yes, I've ignored the rents but if you go to Somers' work you'll find that the rents where cap growth is good tend to be poor (much lower than interest rates) and equally I've ignored any expenses on the properties. Now honestly, apart from deductions against other income, how much does each property return? - you can add that to the pot of income, but I don't think it does much except delay the inevitable. OTOH, the cash you are drawing down (but not rents) is also vulnerable to inflation.
And if interest rises, capgrowth will slow, at least to begin with and maybe even a whole property cycle won't be enough to save you, especially if the cash runs out.
Happy to hear your thoughts.
<KS> said:This was posted in the meeting place thread about the Perth meeting.
The meeting is in Mandurah (1hr south of perth).
The venue is Nino's fish & chip café, at the marina. (Not Cicerrelo's.)
Nino's is located in the newish shopping area at the marina. If you drive into the marina - Dolphin Drive - and go to a roundabout where there is a car park on the left, the water & boats ~50m directly in front of you, shops in front on the LHS and apartments in front on the RHS; then Nino's is at the far corner of the shops on the LHS. The main route from that roundabout actually does a right turn and heads towards the boat/fishing club.
Hope that helps you and your brother find us.
The meeting is at 12pm (Midday).
It lunch/drinks/chat.
<KS>
markpatric said:I agree Quiggles people seem to forget they are borrowing more money in drawing equity, it is not free money.
This is a great strategy but it`s like picking the winners at flemington the day after the race is run.
And so, to the investors using this strategy, time is the big factor, who says that R/E is going to grow by 10% a year?, in fact what happens if it goes down 5% over a few years? or 30%!, happens in USA all the time!, just because it has shown some kind of predictable growth in Aussie before does not mean it will continue to do so, and so what would happen if it did not move for 9 years do we still draw the money each year in the hope that all of a sudden we will get a huge CG?.
It definately could and should work but the reality could be very different.