Question, where do these "previously bound CO² molecules come from"?
You will notice that for clarity, I have corrected your last sentence.
Hydrocarbons, mostly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Question, where do these "previously bound CO² molecules come from"?
You will notice that for clarity, I have corrected your last sentence.
Hydrocarbons, mostly.
You fail basic chemistry, Hydrocarbons are exclusively Hydrogen and Carbon. There is no Oxygen in these molecules. The Oxygen comes from the air.
True but in the context of the discussion here scoring points by nitpicking achieves little of value to the discussion.
Pine trees grown in extra nasty polluting stuff!
now add the increased humdity expected and then substitute "pine trees" for "crops"....
You could then feed the third world without having to give them billions in reparations. I can't understand why the watermelons aren't pleased.
You could then feed the third world without having to give them billions in reparations. I can't understand why the watermelons aren't pleased.
Hi Hi E,
The sad thing to me is the terror campaign being waged upon our children, I can accept your argument that we should all read the data and act accordingly but when the Dept Of Education consistently lies to my granchildren causing them to have nightmares of everyone drowning I get a bit steamed up.
Further, finding unadulterated data is getting rather hit and miss, when you have Govt departments and researchers altering data to suit their funding supply just who can one believe?
One thing that is likely to happen in time is that all the outrageous claims will continue to be proven wrong and the whole thing will be ridiculed and exposed for what it is.
Unfortunately, the real problem continues to be ignored and deteriorate and by the time the pollution problem is acknowledged and addressed we will have created a population that is blase about the whole environment thing.
We then face another decade of trying to get people to try to limit pollution rather than flushing it down a river and the money currently being wasted will have to be repaid before we can address the elephant
HAARP has a direct effect on the Schumann Frequency of the atmosphere, which in turn alters most living thing's behaviours. Makes people in general more "frenetic" and panicky.
Huge power grids do the same thing - similar effects have been measured over Tokyo, New York and Delhi.
I would appreciate a link to the evidence for this...
I actually looked it up. Here is the best for HAARP's effects . . . .
EYEWITNESS EVIDENCE!
The wiki stuff on Schumann Resonance says it is alleged to affect bioenergetics but no actual proof exists. The crap I will read!
I don't care about the pointless arguments about climate change.
But, it makes sense from a sustainable perspective (in terms of not just ******* away non-renewable energy) to make investments in other energy forms.
It is purely a rational, economic position.
I don't care about the pointless arguments about climate change.
But, it makes sense from a sustainable perspective (in terms of not just ******* away non-renewable energy) to make investments in other energy forms.
It is purely a rational, economic position.
I agree, but let the commercial market sort it out, not government interference. More people will do more business with "Greener" companies, and more companies will do more business with "Greener" Companies. Why let the government get involved.