Ha! you can't read spludge.
I did say I believe in science back in post #
Didn't believe you then, don't believe you now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ha! you can't read spludge.
I did say I believe in science back in post #
So, when you have been looking out the window for the last 50 years, what have you observed (forget what you've been told).You're basing your opinion on anecdotal evidence gathered from your window, and a guy from an internet forum who reckons stuff just like you, and telling people to beware of peer reviewed science upon which close to 100% of the science community agree with. No wonder you're having fun, you're having us all on.
The IPCC was created and funded to find evidence that human activity is the primary cause of climate change, so that's what they are going to do.The IPCC has concluded to a very high degree of confidence that climate change is real and caused by humans. No it isn't 100%
<lots of rubbish deleted>
If the science had been settled then the IPCC wouldn't be scrambling now to try and explain away the unexpected 'hiatus'.
The science is far from settled.
The idea that anyone can accurately predict the future climate within fractions of a degree in a system as complex as the planet Earth, and then attribute fractions of those fractions of a degree to be the result of a trace gas that human activity emits in miniscule quantities (compared to the total CO2 in the atmosphere), is just ridiculous.
So, when you have been looking out the window for the last 50 years, what have you observed (forget what you've been told).
Please explain to me just exactly what Climate Change actually refers to.
Give me some concrete examples of Climate Change.
The IPCC was created and funded to find evidence that human activity is the primary cause of climate change, so that's what they are going to do.
If they start producing data suggesting humans might not be the primary cause, then that's the end of their funding and the end of the IPCC.
They have been scaremongering about climate change for decades, and so far... nothing. No increase in extreme weather events, no cities drowned by rising sea levels, and no increase in temperatures for two decades. Nothing has happened, but let's all pay more taxes to fund their continued scaremongering campaign.The really story frightens the crap out of them and they wish they were wrong
Also, your belief that because YOU can't explain or understand something means that it doesn't exist, is actually the ridiculous thing here
Their finding two decades ago was that global temperatures would soar uncontrollably due to human CO2 emissions.if you for example, had some evidence contradicting their findings, they would be sure to review it
My observations are to inject some objectivity into this mania.Rain, hail and shine. I hope that helps. Which of course it doesn't, just like your observations don't.
I already know what CC refers to - hence my bwahahaha mentality on the subject (see above).After all this and you were yet to look up a definition of what you were disagreeing with?
It has already been said a number of times by myself and others that the Climate is changing all the time, and has been since the dawn of time. Nothing to see here folks, go about your lives.I expect wikipedia gave you enough concrete examples? There's plenty of evidence of climate change, I think what you're searching for is evidence that humans are contributing right?
Not down at prime waterfront real estate with views, I hope.And I will tell you this for a fact, climate scientists are literally scared. What they publish is conservative. The really story frightens the crap out of them and they wish they were wrong. There are Australian climate scientists buying property in Southern Tasmania.
No, that chart was posted to illustrate the failure of the IPCC's predictions.This graph was posted by Shadow to disprove any climate change.
If I was 13 years old, I might just believe some of it, but I'm not. Almost everyone I talk to of my age and older take all this with a grain of salt. Why? you work it out.
The only ones who don't are the treehugger sect and the younger ones, it seems.
(waiting for personal attack via PM from LibGS )
Please explain to me just exactly what Climate Change actually refers to.
Give me some concrete examples of Climate Change.
I'm not being smart now; this is a serious question.
I hope the answers are up to it.
No worries; found it:
It is undisputed that the earth is warming up. That's a scientific fact. We know that carbon dioxide heats up the atmosphere. Who is the biggest producer of carbon dioxide? We humans are. The only rational conclusions you can draw from that is that we caused it.
Hmmm...Who is the biggest producer of carbon dioxide? We humans are.
To BV and other hardline skeptics, unless you have some hefty evidence to not just counter the majority of the scientific community, but also prove your position with absolutely ZERO doubt (and sorry but 50+ years of anecdotal observation living in Victoria doesnt count as hefty) surely this makes the decision a simple one.
Here are some real data from Nasa and other sources concerning the climate change. You can see that they are very different looking from the graph above.