Hi All,
Something I’ve been thinking about for a while and would appreciate your thoughts.. I’d like to know how people think prices for new and old stock find an equilibrium over time. I think units and houses might be slightly different, but if I could just give the example of units because they’re what I’m looking at
Blue chip suburb, lots of 60’s & 70’s 8pack units (2bed, 1bath, 1car), with say mean price $350k.
Recent builds are 2bed, 2bath, 1car, and a mean price $450-$500k.
Obviously there are features (extra bath), better layout and mod cons with the new builds that command the $150k premium, but how long does it take for these features to wear off and prices reach an equilibrium?
One could say the new builds lift up the price of the old? I know looking at RPData can give that illusion..
One the other hand the new stock may give a slight oversupply, less rental demand which may leave the old a little stagnant?
Thoughts?
Something I’ve been thinking about for a while and would appreciate your thoughts.. I’d like to know how people think prices for new and old stock find an equilibrium over time. I think units and houses might be slightly different, but if I could just give the example of units because they’re what I’m looking at
Blue chip suburb, lots of 60’s & 70’s 8pack units (2bed, 1bath, 1car), with say mean price $350k.
Recent builds are 2bed, 2bath, 1car, and a mean price $450-$500k.
Obviously there are features (extra bath), better layout and mod cons with the new builds that command the $150k premium, but how long does it take for these features to wear off and prices reach an equilibrium?
One could say the new builds lift up the price of the old? I know looking at RPData can give that illusion..
One the other hand the new stock may give a slight oversupply, less rental demand which may leave the old a little stagnant?
Thoughts?