Hi GoAnna, I am not trying to have a go at you, just point out that some of your logic - whilst good intentioned - may be flawed and in certain circumstances dangerous. I unfortunately do have experience of these and related types of issues due to my previous career in law enforcement.
The police and telephone company can obtain the details of the caller - that's the easy bit - its a simple database search. The phone company generally will not release them to the public without a court order. The police MAY identify the caller for you if there are sufficient grounds to investigate an official complaint. They certainly will not come right out and just give you the details. It all depends on circumstances of the message...
My specific advice is - if you feel threatened - go to the police. Let them handle it and follow the specific advice you are given at the time. It will come out who the originator was - but always let the police handle it...
if you were to contact them - then what are you going to say??? who is this??? bet they dont tell you... PLease stop texting me??? bet it gets worse!! Calling an unknown person who is harrassing you will not help your safety - it may very well (and has) make things worse. Different story if you know them - but always be wary of the unknown.
Again, calling them is not likely to identify them - unless you recognise the voice in the first few seconds then they are certainly unlikely to tell you who they are. And, as i pointed out above, if they are sending these msgs, they are probably waiting for a reaction from the victim...and reacting usually escalates things.
on a side note, you used to be able to do reverse searches on Greypages on the net, but telstra have stuffed it up for everyone!! go telstra!!
yadreamin, its not certain types of messages that are a problem, but the reaction of the person receiving...the actual bit of legislation is below for everyones info - it should be fairly easy to understand.
474.17 Using a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offence
(1) A person is guilty of an offence if:
(a) the person uses a carriage service; and
(b) the person does so in a way (whether by the method of use or
the content of a communication, or both) that reasonable
persons would regard as being, in all the circumstances,
menacing, harassing or offensive.
My understanding of the new law is that intent is not required either - i.e. if they send the msg as a joke or by mistake and DO NOT INTEND to menace or harass, they STILL contravene the Act and are liable for punishment should the receiver, as a reasonable person, feel menaced or harassed.
Serious stuff isn't it!!??!!
at any rate - good luck with it and if it becomes problematic for you, please show the messages to the police - do not take the matter into your own hands.
cheers
UC