Terry Ryder article below.
Outer suburbs continue to out-perform "prime" areas
By Terry Ryder, 16th October 2008
The common belief that expensive inner-city suburbs always out-perform cheaper outer-lying suburbs is the greatest myth in real estate.
There's no statistical basis to the claim that the "better suburbs" close to the city are the safest investments and are better at resisting downturns.
In fact, the figures prove it wrong. I call it The Myth of Prime Out-performance. It's a mantra for property professionals, who have repeated it so often it's come to be accepted as truth by many investors.
However, the myth of prime out-performance has become widespread throughout the real estate industry and subsequently deeply entrenched in investors' minds.
The key thing about the claim of superior performance by prime suburbs is those who make it never support it with figures. They have an attitude but they don't have an argument. The reason they don't back it up with data is that the facts contradict them.
So what they are saying is wrong... what are you saying in stead which right which we could learn from ?