Incorrect. You can't see cos you clearly don't wish to see.
You've fallen for the same trap that most modern Australians and media have fallen into - the Presidential style - leader takes all approach.
Once you understand a bit more about how the system works....and I find that unlikely with your blanket 'all politicians lie' mantra. It's very cool to say but grossly inaccurate, there are many many upstanding candidates from both sides of Parliament.....you'll find out that the general party position overrules what the leader says / thinks.
This was amply demonstrated when your favourite "ol' Malcolm" got the heave ho. The branch members were not happy at all with Malcolm agreeing with labor's position on climate change and the carbon tax. They accurately sensed the groundswell of the majority of the Australian population who consider the Carbon Tax a farce and the underlying premise of the Climate Change debate wholly unsubstantiated....to the satisfaction of the common people who will bear the brunt of the Tax.
As it turned out, the change to Tony and the policies he wanted put forth at the Fed election in August 2010 saw the biggest loss of seats for Labor for any first term Fed Govt in history. It was simply the fact that Labor had such a commanding lead from the 2007 election that they managed to hang on for a draw at 72 seats each. To claw back something like 16 seats was a huge swing away from Labor as compared with the 2007 result.
Subsequently of course, with the Green influence now amply demonstrated, and what silent little economic freeloaders they have proven to be, the Australian population has now seen what Labor and the Greens philosophies on management are, and clearly don't want a bar of it.
Bring on an election.
The subject is Australia's next Prime Minister. Not Australia's next elected party. Hence I was responding to that question. I highly dislike Abbott and the direction that he is taking the party. It is populist and lowest common denominator. As much as I found Costello irksome at the time he wrote a very interesting opinion piece about the drift of the party away from it's roots. It's just a fourth rate tea party copy now.
I want a viable alternative. Not neat little sound bites designed to appeal to those who just want to blame all the ills on immigrants and women.
Oh - and I did have a chance to vote for who would be the next PM. And I put him last
Care to point out specific areas which the policy of the greens mimics a communist state? Please. Details. And don't just use that pathetic errrrm they want to tax me and stuff. All states impose taxes of some sort. I'm looking for key policy points. Such as the way in which the approach taken to natural resources (bugger the environment, we got some soil to rip up, yeah hah) are very similar.
As for Carbon Tax - is that the same Carbon Tax that Tony Abbott supported over the ETS in 2009? My. What a short memory you have. So, really, all that the ALP have done is implement a policy that Abbott has already stated support for. He should be happy he has such an impact.
Oh, and it is the nature of the party political system that politicians have to lie at some stage. This is more true of the ALP than liberals as at least the liberals allow a conscience vote. But there are some former politicians I do respect. Chief amonst them is the late Peter Andren. Now, there was a man with morals, ethics and commitment to his local community.