Why speculate and assume the worst? Why bring religion into it? These idiots obviously have issues to write an ad like that but mindless speculation about it being a Muslim male with bad intentions or about it being a Muslim male with multiple wives does no one any good.
HELLO! I did not bring Muslim to the table, I only answered some of the questions once it WAS brought to the table.
Jinan is a female name I believe, put your pitchfork back in the shed
Nobody had a pitchfork out, except you here.
"Jinan" may be married, and Muslim men are allowed to have multiple partners.
I never said it WAS a Muslim male with multiple wives, I stated that the person who had written the ad (Jinan) MAY be married, therefore there would be a male presence, this was in answer to you stating that the name was a female one. Someone else had already mentioned Muslim men, so I was referring to that post, in regards to the multiple partners (which according to the Koran, they are allowed to have). I never said they DID have multiple partners nor did I say anything about bad intentions.
The advertisement is unclear as to whether it is a share house arrangement, or a 'flat' at the back of the house.
Clearly, if it is a shared house, they will want someone to 'fit' in with the family, but there are some large concerns here that apply whether or not it is a shared house.
No ham/pork - You can't dictate to a tenant what they are allowed to eat. The advertisement states that the tenant would have their own kitchen, so they should be able to eat and prepare whatever food they want.
No alcohol - Unless it is a shared house situation, and a member of the family is a recovering alcoholic, do you have a right to tell the tenant they can't have a drink?
No relationship - If a shared house, you don't want your tenant to bring home a 'guest' to spend the night, but you can't tell them they can't have a boyfriend. If it is a separate accommodation, it is none of your business anyway.
Our orders - This one is just scary! It could mean anything, and is unclear, but at the end of the day, who are they to give 'orders' to their tenant.