*****************************************cumown said:I was just curious, as per my previous post, what you consider a small house. Not to question your judgment, just because I have personally been struggling with the appropriate size house to build at times.
Recently in the Anchorage I have signed up to build houses smaller than I normally would, just based on the smaller land size I was building smaller houses. But now that land prices have jumped 40k-50k, I am sorta 2nd guessing my decision, and wonder if I should have built bigger.
Thanks
Mark
Dear Mark,
1. What are your own thinking on this?
2. From my own experience looking at the immediate cpaital growth upon the house completion as well as the subsequent capital growth for my 2 houses at 17, Broughton Way and 26, Properjohn Drive, a 200-220 m2 (living) 4 bedroom house will command a better immediate returns as compared to a 170-180(Living) m2 4-bedroom house, in the immediate short term context of less than 5 years.
3. I have similarly observed that those bigger houses (230-250 m2) are also commanding higher resale values in today's market conditions.
4. However, I still do not know for sure how the capital growth and returns will eventually work out in the medium and long term basis;- though I guess it would be lower in the long term context, given the higher accumulated depreciation costs enjoyed.
5. Based on what I have observed of my own assoicate, Mr Alan Wong, the optmial size house seems to be in the range of 205-225 m2(lving) 4 bedrooms house for the Anchorage Estate.
6. I hope these feedback is of help to your decision-making process.
7. Thank you.
regards,
Kenneth KOH