'Fast Eddy', the man..

It's not likely their assets will be devalued significantly. Most centres are prime sites and purpose built, with a guaranteed income stream.

Biggest risk as a going concern would be a wages blow out.

Another big risk is government policy changes; particularly subsidies and regulation.

Just like aged care, private health care, superannuation and private education, child care is a heavily protected and regulated industry that relies on the taxpayers' tit.

As soon as the government gives subsidies or tax breaks (whatever you want to call it) to an industry they will almost certainly wish to impose some control. This reduces the entrepeneur's ability to control their own destiny or achieve extraordinary returns.

Politically, childcare appears safe; any major policy tampering that would reduce funding (and therefore demand) would hurt the sacred 'working families' and is unlikely to be countenanced by a vote-seeking politician.

The other possible threat is creeping regulation that may increase overheads without compensation. Governments are particularly active in regulating anything to do with children and, just like with schools, there are frequent demands for childcare to 'do more'.

However, as we have seen in NSW and WA recently, politics can change dramatically and the risk-averse investor might wish to steer clear of industries that have high political exposure.

Peter
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Peter, my money would be on the govt not touching child care, esp when you consider families have painted themselves into a financial corner. How many households can afford a home now without a dual income? If the govt significantly reduces child care, it will put downwards pressure on the fertility rate and pull many women out of the workforce, thereby lowering GDP.

Australia's debt to GDP ratio is unsustainable for these very reasons.

Nevertheless, you have ignorant elites like Maxine McKew spouting how child care workers shouldn't have to handle more than 3 children because it is stressful to do so. Presumably she thinks mothers with more than 3 kids should be legislated against too.
 
Back
Top