Your point was a correlation between wealth and your level of education.
.
No; it was not.
I mentioned "and/or" several times.
I know full well that education does not equal wealth.
The poster said that we have "limited immigration".
By that, he meant we are very selective about which levels of education, skills, professions and possibly wealth as well (although I'd doubt that wealth is an immigration criteria at all in Aus) are used to select immigrants to Aus.
I am merely illustrating that by the very existence of lower-end suburbs - all over Australia - that have immigrants living in them (and some with a larger representation) that we, in fact; do not have "limited immigration" as the poster describes it.
And based on my observations over 4 decades of adult life; we have lots of "unlimited immigration"...and I don't mean volume; I mean selection criteria.
This is based on the reasonable assumption that professional/highly educated folks, wealthy folks (often these two things are found in the one person when talking of immigrants) will not stay in lower-end suburbs for very long by choice.
If they do, it might be to live near family, but even then; many live in a nicer place - which is within reach of the family. God; the last thing I want to do is live very near any of my family. I love them; but I don't want to be constantly near any of them. I want a bit of protection via some distance.
Highly educated immigrants don't make a habit of coming here by choice to work in a scuzzy low paid job, and then have to live in a lower-end suburb as a result.
Why would they? They may as well stay in the homeland.
As I have said; we do not have limited immigration. Isn't it great!!
What a frickin fantastic Country we have...we let everyone in; plenty don't.
You can all keep twisting what I say and pull out some other irrelevant Gubbmint stats until the cows come home.