calling someone "black" because they have more melatonin in their skin is not racist, it's observation.
calling someone "white" because they have less melatonin in their skin is not racist, either.
example - the term like "white trash" would be just as effective if you removed the word "white", therefore, it's not racist. calling someone "trash" works with just the word, or other words in front of it like "trailer", "hobo", "gutter" etc.
so him calling someone a "black _insert derogatory term here_" is more of a public insult to his character, not his race. given, the term is just as effective without the word "black", but it's more attention grabbing to use it.
maybe he just has an arrogant sense of humour, that others find offensive.
but then, it's his right to offend as much as it is your right to be offended.
If there was no known racism between blacks and whites to start with, which we re all aware of, then ll of the above would be correct & relevant
However, we KNOW that rcism exists... and in this example, the peboss is isnullting the race, you stupid AUSTLRAIN - it is putting your stupidity down to your race.
How can you honestly say you do not understand that ?
Why did this particular boss feel the need to prefix his own statements with "I'm not racist "? If he had called him short he would not have mentionend "Im not racist", sow what made him mention it this time ? To me it's sadly, because he's being racist, and he feels he has a right to be racist to tht elvel, it shoudl be allowed nd anyone who whinges otherwise is a dogooder (or probably black)