What is it with you? Aren't you supposed to be an athlete, & here you are eating chocolate & KFC! Sheesh!
The bet is off! There's no more chocolate!
I ride so I can eat those things!
pinkboy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is it with you? Aren't you supposed to be an athlete, & here you are eating chocolate & KFC! Sheesh!
The bet is off! There's no more chocolate!
I ride so I can eat those things!
pinkboy
...I'm offering them for FREE for anyone who is willing to go get them.
Where are they? At least say the city.
Skater,
did the buyer stop the claim she filed in the mags courts?
Legally, it's not the same; she had the item delivered to her despite no longer wanting it. The onus is no longer on the buyer.Rob and I were discussing this at breakfast.
He said there should be something written where she must return...which he says puts the onus back on the buyer.
Simply stating that someone can pick them up, isn't enough.
Similar to if she bought something, she didn't like it, she must return it, for a refund.
Legally, it's not the same; she had the item delivered to her despite no longer wanting it. The onus is no longer on the buyer.
A Statement of Claim is a formal claim, and ignoring it will usually result in a default judgment against you. This is terrible advice.
Sorry, Final Notice of Claim - which I believe is merely a terminology difference. (I'm used to Queensland.)This isn't a statement of claim.
Sorry, Final Notice of Claim - which I believe is merely a terminology difference. (I'm used to Queensland.)
In either case, skater needs to file a defence in the form of a Form 4, not ignore it.
Sorry, Final Notice of Claim - which I believe is merely a terminology difference. (I'm used to Queensland.)
In either case, skater needs to file a defence in the form of a Form 4, not ignore it.
You just have to be a bit careful of self entitled idiots like this. They seem to have done this before.
Yes, I get the feeling that they have. They seem to be one step ahead all the way, which is why I don't want to let her win. At least if someone stands up to her, she may have second thoughts about doing it to someone else.
Like I said before, the $$ value is irrelevant to me now. I've already written the goods off. It is the principal of the whole thing that upsets me.
That is how we feel many times when going after tenants
Because we know it will take time, effort and money to chase some principle.
Unfortunately, lawyers everywhere will roll their eyes once they hear this from clients.
Because we know it will take time, effort and money to chase some principle.