G'day again, Thommo - or is that Bill
(your words...)
Les, Those of us not directly involved read the relevent threads in a disjointed manner and skimmed some long posts (at least I assume I wasn't the only one) but I put you firmly in the "Kill Bill" camp. Am I mistaken?
From where I sit, Thommo, yes, you are mistaken. I DO welcome diverse opinion, so long as it all remains respectful.
In Bill's case, his posts NEVER use bad language (that I recall), and the only reason I tended to show any negativity toward Bill was that (in the Navra thread) Bill did (in my eyes) tend to state "this won't work" rather than "HOW COULD this work". And a few of my posts do use examples to show this is the way I felt. But, again, maybe the written word didn't quite convey what I was trying to say. Obviously, Steve DID get quite upset ...... and I wondered why Bill didn't "get it" - but then, it's that written word again.
In THIS thread, I attempted to draw Bill out - so that we could all see "the other side" of someone who appears to have been successful in the sharemarket. In a way, I was attempting to have Bill provide some useful info relating to his OWN endeavours, rather than just remaining a foil (or is that a "prickle") to Steve Navra.
I have nothing against either of these two people. I've met Steve, but haven't (to my knowledge) got to meet Bill as yet. But I'd like to - there is obvious knowledge there, and I'd like to get some more of that.
And, re Bill's (and yours, and others) wanting to provide balance, I say "Cool!" and "Thank you". By all means do it, but, please, in a way that questions others, rather than stating your opinions of someone else's operation as fact. In so doing, it PROMOTES discussion without creating tension.
SommerSoft Forum is a fraud when you say you welcome dissenting opinion
You're not stating that as a fact, are you Thommo
Mate, I can't (and won't) answer for the forum - I've answered for ME above ......
Regards,