Free Dazz!
- Thread starter cu@thetop
- Start date
9 out of 10 of his posts were negative and putting people down.
1 out of 10 absolutely gold posts and so much to take from them.
I still read each post hoping it was a 1/10 comment
Would suggest that it wouldn't of been an easy decision for the mod's, having a guess and hoping that he was also warned first before being banned.
1 out of 10 absolutely gold posts and so much to take from them.
I still read each post hoping it was a 1/10 comment
Would suggest that it wouldn't of been an easy decision for the mod's, having a guess and hoping that he was also warned first before being banned.
When he can stop behaving like a petulant child?
You don't get banned for being "interesting and controversial".
You can get banned for being downright rude though.
You don't get banned for being "interesting and controversial".
You can get banned for being downright rude though.
9 out of 10 of his posts were negative and putting people down.
1 out of 10 absolutely gold posts and so much to take from them.
I still read each post hoping it was a 1/10 comment
Would suggest that it wouldn't of been an easy decision for the mod's, having a guess and hoping that he was also warned first before being banned.
Agree with all of the above, from what I've heard there was like a dozen warnings.
Sim
Administrator
After many, many warnings he was banned for his continued attacks on other posters, posting in a condescending and unhelpful manner - especially towards new posters.
It was finally decided that the damage he was doing to the forum outweighed any potential value he might have added.
As an example, in the "Hands up for those nearing Financial Freedom" thread, he had at least 9 opportunities to add something constructive, but chose instead to belittle other members and infer that he knew something that nobody else did. This is only one example of many threads he has posted in recently which faced similar problems.
His constant denigration of residential property investors as fools who are never going to be as successful as commercial property investors, was completely inappropriate and he was warned about his posting and asked to change things on numerous occasions.
FWIW, posting strong opinions on a topic (such as politics) is not in itself grounds for banning - provided that it is done without resorting to name calling or personal remarks directed at other members. There were many cases where this also occurred.
The ban is permanent - Dazz will not be allowed to post under that username again on this site.
It was finally decided that the damage he was doing to the forum outweighed any potential value he might have added.
As an example, in the "Hands up for those nearing Financial Freedom" thread, he had at least 9 opportunities to add something constructive, but chose instead to belittle other members and infer that he knew something that nobody else did. This is only one example of many threads he has posted in recently which faced similar problems.
His constant denigration of residential property investors as fools who are never going to be as successful as commercial property investors, was completely inappropriate and he was warned about his posting and asked to change things on numerous occasions.
FWIW, posting strong opinions on a topic (such as politics) is not in itself grounds for banning - provided that it is done without resorting to name calling or personal remarks directed at other members. There were many cases where this also occurred.
The ban is permanent - Dazz will not be allowed to post under that username again on this site.
